[Standards] XEP-0060: Inconsistency between SHIM registration and SHIM registry
stpeter at mozilla.com
Thu Aug 2 20:10:15 UTC 2018
On 8/2/18 2:02 PM, Melvin Vermeeren wrote:
> In XEP-0060, Publish-Subscribe, there appears to be an inconsistency regarding
> the SHIM registration and the current listing in the SHIM registry.
> XEP-0060, in the examples, reads:
>> <header name='SubID'>
> This is also consistent with the "SHIM Headers" section of the XEP:
> However, the SHIM registry lists it as "pubsub#subid" and not "SubID":
> The question is which of these is actually correct? When resolving this we may
> want to add a note since implementations can expect both "SubID" and
> "pubsub#subid", unless I misunderstand the SHIM registry list.
I suspect this is a copy and paste error in the registry.
> The same applies to "Collection" and "pubsub#collection". I also note there is
> an entry in the registry for "pubsub#expire", but I cannot find anything
> regarding this SHIM Header in XEP-0060. Am I missing something?
That also sounds like an error in the SHIM registry - IIRC that token is
used only in data forms, not SHIM.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Standards