[Standards] Another proposal - Handling JIDs for MIX-CORE, MIX-PRESENCE and MIX-PAM

Jonas Wielicki jonas at wielicki.name
Sun Jun 3 08:56:10 UTC 2018

On Sonntag, 3. Juni 2018 09:29:13 CEST Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> 2018-06-03 1:33 GMT+02:00 Steve Kille <steve.kille at isode.com>:
> > (Nick and Bare JID).
> I’m just on my way home from a very productive and interesting meetup
> with designers and artists. And without knowledge of the current MIX
> debate - just by analyzing the way Conversations currently implements
> group chats / MUC - people very quickly challenged the need for having
> per room nicks. And the very few arguments I was able to make in
> defense of having nicks in groups chats are only valid for anonymous
> groups.
> Just wanting to put this out there…

This is also a good point. Maybe we want to move nicknames to MIX-ANON (or 
maybe another extension), too. The display name could be drawn from the 
roster, the vcard, XEP-0172, or similar.

kind regards,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180603/0cc32770/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list