[Standards] Another proposal - Handling JIDs for MIX-CORE, MIX-PRESENCE and MIX-PAM

Florian Schmaus flo at geekplace.eu
Sun Jun 3 09:40:00 UTC 2018


On 03.06.2018 10:56, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> On Sonntag, 3. Juni 2018 09:29:13 CEST Daniel Gultsch wrote:
>> 2018-06-03 1:33 GMT+02:00 Steve Kille <steve.kille at isode.com>:
>>> (Nick and Bare JID).
>>
>> I’m just on my way home from a very productive and interesting meetup
>> with designers and artists. And without knowledge of the current MIX
>> debate - just by analyzing the way Conversations currently implements
>> group chats / MUC - people very quickly challenged the need for having
>> per room nicks. And the very few arguments I was able to make in
>> defense of having nicks in groups chats are only valid for anonymous
>> groups.
>>
>> Just wanting to put this out there…
> 
> This is also a good point. Maybe we want to move nicknames to MIX-ANON (or 
> maybe another extension), too. The display name could be drawn from the 
> roster, the vcard, XEP-0172, or similar.

As far as I understood nicknames are already optional in current MIX. If
that's the case, then it should be moved out of MIX-CORE.

Not to be confused with the stable participant identifier that you will
get upon joining the MIX channel (of which I can't find an official term
for).

- Florian



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180603/f45da534/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list