[Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE
flo at geekplace.eu
Mon Jun 4 15:28:20 UTC 2018
On 04.06.2018 16:43, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> A random side note: I found another argument against the variant where the
> client resource is encoded together with the participant id in the resource:
> The client resource is -- in contrast to the channel name and participant id
> -- not under control of the MIX service.
Just to clarify: Not sure about others but I never meant to encode the
client resource when I used `client-id`, but an ID assigned by the MIX
service for the participant's XMPP session (which maps to a client
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Standards