[Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

Florian Schmaus flo at geekplace.eu
Mon Jun 4 15:28:20 UTC 2018

On 04.06.2018 16:43, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> A random side note: I found another argument against the variant where the 
> client resource is encoded together with the participant id in the resource: 
> The client resource is -- in contrast to the channel name and participant id 
> -- not under control of the MIX service.

Just to clarify: Not sure about others but I never meant to encode the
client resource when I used `client-id`, but an ID assigned by the MIX
service for the participant's XMPP session (which maps to a client

- Florian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180604/27f1adee/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list