[Standards] Addressing for IQs in MIX-CORE

Kevin Smith kevin.smith at isode.com
Tue Jun 5 08:14:27 UTC 2018

On 4 Jun 2018, at 16:28, Florian Schmaus <flo at geekplace.eu> wrote:
> On 04.06.2018 16:43, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
>> A random side note: I found another argument against the variant where the 
>> client resource is encoded together with the participant id in the resource: 
>> The client resource is -- in contrast to the channel name and participant id 
>> -- not under control of the MIX service.
> Just to clarify: Not sure about others but I never meant to encode the
> client resource when I used `client-id`, but an ID assigned by the MIX
> service for the participant's XMPP session (which maps to a client
> resource).

Yes, I’m using client-id to mean ‘translated resource’.


More information about the Standards mailing list