[Standards] Business rules of Last Message Correction

Tedd Sterr teddsterr at outlook.com
Mon Jun 11 13:52:13 UTC 2018

> I think an ns bump in 308 is better than a duplicate spec, really (unless there’s something I’m missing).

I'm not strongly for a new spec., though I thought it might be more appropriate in this case given the aversion to changing Drafts and that it's already well implemented; also avoiding possible old-0048/new-0048 type issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180611/02425b5f/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list