[Standards] Business rules of Last Message Correction
teddsterr at outlook.com
Mon Jun 11 13:52:13 UTC 2018
> I think an ns bump in 308 is better than a duplicate spec, really (unless there’s something I’m missing).
I'm not strongly for a new spec., though I thought it might be more appropriate in this case given the aversion to changing Drafts and that it's already well implemented; also avoiding possible old-0048/new-0048 type issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards