[Standards] Business rules of Last Message Correction

Sam Whited sam at samwhited.com
Mon Jun 11 14:11:17 UTC 2018


On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, at 09:02, Tedd Sterr wrote:
> As long as it doesn't confuse existing implementations, hopefully 
> nothing; but I suppose that's what the namespace bump is for.

It sounded to me like this would be a new distinct namespace older-than-previous-message corrections, a namespace bump may be more contentious in a draft XEP.

—Sam


More information about the Standards mailing list