[Standards] xep-0313 missing features

Edwin Mons jsf at edwinm.ik.nu
Mon Mar 5 11:29:59 UTC 2018


Why would it not be allowed?  The only confusing thing there would be if
your (possibly server-mandated) page size is smaller than the number of
items between before and after, as before and after have conflicting
indicators of which part of the items you'd want to receive.

Edwin



On 05/03/2018 12:11, Lazar Otasevic wrote:
> Kevin says we can :) I asked him to clarify... we'll see.
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Philipp Hörist <philipp at hoerist.com
> <mailto:philipp at hoerist.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>         You can already fill holes with the current spec, by
>         specifying both <before/> and <after/> on the RSM query can’t
>         you? If that doesn’t obviously follow from the text, that’s
>         something we should clarify.
>
>
>
>     No i dont think you can do that. You can either specify <before>
>     OR <after>.
>     RSM is for going one page further or backwards with <after> and
>     <before> inside a already filtered result, you cannot filter the
>     result again with upper and lower limits.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Standards mailing list
>     Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
>     <https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards>
>     Unsubscribe: Standards-unsubscribe at xmpp.org
>     <mailto:Standards-unsubscribe at xmpp.org>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: Standards-unsubscribe at xmpp.org
> _______________________________________________


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180305/0f5690d1/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list