[Standards] XEP-0393 and XEP-0394 naming

Jonas Wielicki jonas at wielicki.name
Thu Mar 8 16:35:06 UTC 2018

On Donnerstag, 8. März 2018 17:18:02 CET Kozlov Konstantin wrote:
> Hello!
> 08.03.2018, 19:03, "Sam Whited" <sam at samwhited.com>:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 10:01, Kozlov Konstantin wrote:
>  I think "Markup" more suits
>  for XEP-0393 and "Styling" for XEP-0394.I guess, we should think about
>  renaming those XEPs to make their names
>  less confusing.
> I'm not against this (as the author of 0393) if people find this confusing,
> but swapping the names seems even more confusing to me.
> The XEPs are not so widely implemented for the moment to care much about it.
> Anyway, we can just give new, less confusing names for both XEPs.
> For example we may rename XEP-0393 to "Markdown" 'cause its syntax somewhat
> similar to Markdown  language. 

For the love of whatever is holy to you, don’t call it Markdown. You don’t 
know which pandoras box you’re opening there.

I’ll rename XEP-0394 on the next update to something more unique.

kind regards,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180308/3eeeea55/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list