[Standards] [STANDARDS] XEP-0394: too weak to replace XEP-0071

Evgeny Khramtsov xramtsov at gmail.com
Sat Mar 17 06:37:40 UTC 2018


Fri, 16 Mar 2018 20:11:19 +0000
Tedd Sterr <teddsterr at outlook.com> wrote:

> > This is true, however mostly these are quite coarse-grained.
> > Extensions with lots of optional  
> 
> > parts inside - I'm thinking about XEP-0060 for example - tend to
> > end up with various interop issues.  
> 
> I don't disagree with that, and I'm not suggesting 0394 turns into a
> mass of optional parts.

So you only want to add a single part? But then comes another person
with another feature request, then yet another one and eventually we
have a mess of optional parts :)


More information about the Standards mailing list