[Standards] XEP-0394: too weak to replace XEP-0071

Jonas Wielicki jonas at wielicki.name
Wed Mar 21 09:25:19 UTC 2018


On Mittwoch, 21. März 2018 10:19:34 CET Kozlov Konstantin wrote:
> Hello, Jonas!
>  
> 19.03.2018, 10:51, "Jonas Wielicki" <jonas at wielicki.name>:
> A client can use 394 without support 393 just fine. I don’t see where you
> got this notion from, I guess my initial mail on this was unclear.
> 
> Maybe. It was originally my idea: I just can't figure out how client, which
> supors XEP-0394 only and knows nothing about XP-0393 may understand which
> parts of styled text fragment to remove? 

It’s going to be written down in XEP-0394. As mentioned, a major update is 
pending. I’m currently not having the time to do it.

kind regards,
Jonas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180321/1eef8706/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list