[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Bookmarks 2 (This Time it's Serious)

Maxime Buquet pep at bouah.net
Wed Mar 21 17:50:31 UTC 2018


On 2018/03/21, Maxime Buquet wrote:
> On 2018/03/21, Sam Whited wrote:
> > I agree with this; when I do something on one client, I almost always want it synced to my other clients. Room joining and parting is the same. Similarly, just because my connection dropped and came back up a moment later doesn't mean I should suddenly not be joined to rooms anymore. If I'm in a room, I should autojoin it from all my clients on startup, if I close the room, it should close immediately in my other clients and no longer be autojoined on startup.
> 
> When I do join or part on one client, I almost never want it synced to my
> other clients. I have pretty different use between clients.
> 
> If my connection dropped and came back a moment later, I would want my
> client to rejoin MUCs I was in. I use bookmarks mostly as a way to
> remember MUC JIDs, not to know which state my clients should be in.

To complete the above, to summarize and see if I understand what you
want exactly: if a bookmark is set to autojoin=false, then all my
clients should part or not join this MUC.

This seriously disrupt my workflow, and I don't think there is any other
equivalent at the moment, is there?


Can I propose to dissociate the bookmarking from the syncing bit?

-- 
Maxime “pep” Buquet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180321/299c44bb/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list