[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: IM Routing-NG

Florian Schmaus flo at geekplace.eu
Thu Mar 29 05:55:08 UTC 2018


On 28.03.2018 23:12, Manuel Rubio wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was reading XEP-0344 (Impact of TLS and DNSSEC on Dialback). I
> understand that's for security connection between two XMPP servers (S2S).
> 
> I understood that IM-NG is a new way to route messages to JIDs with the
> same feature activated. Thinking about that, why sending the message to
> the bare JID isn't enough?
> 
> I mean, at this moment if I connect two clients with the same priority
> and send a message to their bare JID, the same message should arrive to
> both of them.

It is not guaranteed that this is the case. It depends on the server
policy as per RFC 6121 § 8.5.2.1.

- Florian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180329/20ef4a10/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list