[Standards] XEP-0045 Room (JID) aliases

Maxime Buquet pep at bouah.net
Tue May 1 11:03:47 UTC 2018


On 2018/05/01, Dave Cridland wrote:
> > I wanted to have fancyname at muc and serious-business at muc, pointing to
> > the same room.
> >
> > For this particular use case an alias might be best, The component knows
> > what other has joined what JID and speaks to them via this JID. I would
> > also be ok with a redirect though, having the component state "business
> > happens _there_".
> >
> > Redirect implies client support I assume, but that would also allow for
> > redirects to other components.
> >
> >
> Right.
> 
> But if you have it in the same domain, then the domain can manage all this
> without the client being at all aware - there's no need for a specification
> here, since you're just using the existing one.

Which existing one? Can you point me to the place in 0045 for this?

Or are you talking of 0045 in general? In this case it would just seem
like an implementation detail (the aliasing) and nothing actually
specified?

-- 
Maxime “pep” Buquet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180501/7ee4a4f6/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list