[Standards] XEP-0045 Room (JID) aliases

Florian Schmaus flo at geekplace.eu
Wed May 2 06:59:55 UTC 2018


On 01.05.2018 13:03, Maxime Buquet wrote:
> On 2018/05/01, Dave Cridland wrote:
>>> I wanted to have fancyname at muc and serious-business at muc, pointing to
>>> the same room.
>>>
>>> For this particular use case an alias might be best, The component knows
>>> what other has joined what JID and speaks to them via this JID. I would
>>> also be ok with a redirect though, having the component state "business
>>> happens _there_".
>>>
>>> Redirect implies client support I assume, but that would also allow for
>>> redirects to other components.
>>>
>>>
>> Right.
>>
>> But if you have it in the same domain, then the domain can manage all this
>> without the client being at all aware - there's no need for a specification
>> here, since you're just using the existing one.
> 
> Which existing one? Can you point me to the place in 0045 for this?

I think what Dave means is that a MUC service could simply merge two
rooms, so that all participants appear in both rooms and both rooms have
a single configuration, subject, etc.

But I could be wrong.

- Florian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180502/e32bab53/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list