[Standards] Update to MIX 0.9.7
manuel at altenwald.com
Thu May 10 20:03:28 UTC 2018
El 2018-05-09 15:53, Steve Kille escribió:
> 3. Mandatory presence (3.9.7). There is an option for a MIX channel
> require presence. This allows a channel to specify the current MUC
> behaviour that online clients are visible with presence (and no
> listeners, which some might object to on privacy grounds). This
> cannot be
> enforced by the MIX channel, so it is a policy that compliant MIX
> are expected to follow. I have clarified this in the text. It seems
> useful to me, but we could drop this option if people feel it will
> never be
I think presence SHOULD NOT be mandatory. In my particular case we're
not using presence at all and I like the flexibility to include/exclude
nodes in the features of the channel.
> 5. 6.3 (Ensuring Message Delivery) describes an important function for
> The detailed approach has issues, which Florian Schmaus flags. Jonas
> Wielicki also flagged the issues in Feb 2017. I am replacing this
> with a reference to a (yet to be written) XEP. Rationale:
> - We clearly do not have the spec right
> - Reliable message delivery seems like a generic capability that
> be used elsewhere.
I still considere that XEP-0199 (ping) fits better than use "markable"
that is confusing because of the use of the same tag in XEP-0333 (chat
markers). It's not needed to write a whole new XEP for that IMO.
More information about the Standards