[Standards] XMPP Council Minutes 2018-11-14

Georg Lukas georg at op-co.de
Tue Nov 20 14:54:09 UTC 2018

(this includes my previous votes for the sake of completeness)

* Tedd Sterr <teddsterr at outlook.com> [2018-11-15 20:41]:
> http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2018-11-14/#16:01:26
> 3) Advance XEP-0357 (Push Notifications) to DRAFT - https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0357.html

(still) -1 (high priority topic hasn't been addressed; but really liked the stripped stanza proposal)

> 4) Advance XEP-0359 (Unique and Stable Stanza IDs) to DRAFT - https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0359.html

(still) -1 until this is addressed:

> 5) PR #692 - XEP-0060: correct "entity" to "<subscription/>" - https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/692


> 6) PR #693 - XEP-0060: Remove unused 'node' attribute on pubsub#event item - https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/693

+1: I was shortly confused about <item>s with @node in Example 10 and
12, but those turned out to be in the disco#items namespace, so all is

> 7) PR #715 - XEP-0045: Add missing disco#info feature to example 4, 9, 78 and 218 - https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/715

+0: I think that the primary goal of examples is to convey the
structure of the actual protocol at hand, and adding all mandatory
boilerplate distracts from that goal. However, I anticipate the
stack-overflow-oriented generation to just copy&paste from examples,
thus leading to bad implementation. I'm torn between those two positions
and thus vote +0.

> 8) PR #716 - XEP-0030: Clarify 'disco#info' feature in 'disco#info' responses - https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/716

-1, but we should add the Note about examples not being normative.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20181120/87ecb57a/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list