[Standards] XMPP Council Minutes 2018-11-14

Evgeny xramtsov at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 15:56:50 UTC 2018



On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:43 PM, Florian Schmaus <flo at geekplace.eu> 
wrote:
> On 20.11.18 15:54, Georg Lukas wrote:
>>  * Tedd Sterr <teddsterr at outlook.com> [2018-11-15 20:41]:
>>>  8) PR #716 - XEP-0030: Clarify 'disco#info' feature in 
>>> 'disco#info' responses - https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/716
>> 
>>  -1, but we should add the Note about examples not being normative.
> 
> The primary purpose of the (unwritten) rule that examples are 
> considered
> non-normative is that broken examples cannot become or seen as correct
> behaviour as of the specification. Your suggestion would add another 
> use
> case to the rule and explicitly encourage broken examples. I fail to 
> see
> why we would want to do that.
> 

I think examples should not omit required elements, such as 'id' 
attribute of
iq stanzas, 'disco#info' feature in 'disco#info' responses and so on. 
If such
an element is omitted, it must be replaced with `...` or something.





More information about the Standards mailing list