[Standards] Backwards compatibility in rich messaging XEPs [Was: Proposed XMPP Extension: Message Reactions]

Sam Whited sam at samwhited.com
Fri Jul 19 23:22:50 UTC 2019


On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, at 18:14, Maxime Buquet wrote:
> Apart from the fact that you use the abomination that is 393, I am
> mostly curious what you're expecting with all this.

Ignoring whether it's a good fallback for reactions, I would like to
defend the beautiful XEP-0393. It's a great XEP. Maybe the best.
Whomever wrote it is obviously a very humble and talented developer, and
probably very handsome too and we should all use it.

—Sam


More information about the Standards mailing list