[Standards] Bookmarks 2 extensibility

Philipp Hörist philipp at hoerist.com
Mon Nov 25 13:47:55 UTC 2019

> On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 12:26, Jonas Schäfer <jonas at wielicki.name> wrote:
>> The only thing I wonder is: Why an extra sub-element? This reminds me of
>> the
>> `X-` prefix which has since been deprecated. We *do* have namespacing in
>> XML,
>> let’s make use of that. Simply state that all unknown child elements of
>> the
>> <{bookmarks:0}conference/> element must be preserved; no need to stuff it
>> away
>> in an extra element.
>From a programming perspective I would argue that storing one element away
is much less work than searching for all unknown child elements.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20191125/5168bf10/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list