[Summit] FOSDEM logistics
emcho at jitsi.org
Mon Jan 21 08:47:03 UTC 2013
Well, we don't need to draw a red line on the floor or anything ...
However, in addition to the obvious overlap (i.e. Jitsi uses XMPP)
there's also a difference in scopes: a lot of the things we demo and
discuss with visitors are about protocols and features that have little
to do with XMPP.
There's also the physical aspect: it is likely that we will actually
need the two tables to setup all our demos.
Maybe one option would be to place the two Jitsi tables next to the
round wall, and keep the lounge almost like last year. We'll just have
to make sure there's enough space for people to pass on their way to the
If this doesn't work then we could just try to work something out once
we get there on Saturday morning.
On 21.01.13, 08:55, Dave Cridland wrote:
> Of course, I'm not going to be there, so my opinion doesn't really
> count, but I'd prefer co-branding the realtime lounge as much as
> possible, rather than splitting the area or anything.
> On 21 Jan 2013 06:12, "Emil Ivov" <emcho at jitsi.org
> <mailto:emcho at jitsi.org>> wrote:
> Hey all,
> Just had a chat with Bear about this and he asked me to move the
> discussion here so that everyone interested can follow:
> It appears that FOSDEM is running low on space this year (I believe they
> lost the AW building) so it seems that we will be sharing the area where
> the real-time lounge was last year. I suppose we'll be a tiny bit tight
> but, given the circumstances, there's no one else we would have
> preferred to be tight with ;).
> We were hence wondering if we needed to pre-arrange any of the
> logistics. Basically we would be fine with our two tables and their
> default config but if you guys are planning on re-spinning the lounge
> then we'd be happy to push things around a bit so that everyone's happy.
> Any thoughts?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 231732 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Summit