[Members] Re: Digital Independence Day - Di.Day in Germany

As a few days have passed and no objections have come up, it seems safe to say there is general support for engaging with the DI.DAY initiative. \o/ I want to clarify one point about the idea that we are already "beyond this" because some XMPP community members have reached out to DI.DAY. I do not see that as a reason to slow down or stop further effort. If anything, it makes it more useful to make sure our own members and projects are aware of what is going on. One helpful role for the Communications Team could be to spread awareness of the DI.DAY initiative within our own community. Not everyone follows the same channels, and not all projects will know about DI.DAY or about the opportunities it creates. Sharing this information simply gives people the chance to decide for themselves if and how they want to get involved. It is also worth saying that the fact that some people have already reached out does not mean others cannot or should not do the same. I do not know what approach was used in the first outreach. Seeing interest from multiple projects and people can actually be a good signal for the DI.DAY organizers. When it comes to showing solutions, I think it can sometimes be better to lead with individual projects rather than the word XMPP itself. XMPP as a term is not very appealing to most end users, and DI.DAY mainly targets end users. Showing real projects and what they offer may be more attractive, and less off putting for the organizers. Those projects can still mention XMPP if they want, but the focus would be on their value, not just on the protocol they use. I also think there is more we can do than just aiming for a listing on the DI.DAY website. Even if some projects decide not to be listed there, they could still benefit from the visibility around the initiative by aligning blog posts, announcements, or other outreach with it. Finally, I understand there is already a group chat where people involved are coordinating this work. Pointing interested members to that chat and inviting them to join the ongoing effort seems like a very practical next step. To be clear, I am not against a simple public endorsement. I just feel there is a lot more we could do here, and that a slightly more active approach could massively benefit our projects and the wider ecosystem.