The Communications Team could initially focus on reaching out within

Hello everyone, For those who may not be familiar with it (I wasn't until looking into it tonight), Digital Independence Day (DI.DAY) is a German initiative by "Save Social - Networks for Democracy" that aims to raise awareness around digital sovereignty, vendor independence, and alternatives to centralized platforms. The campaign combines public messaging with practical actions, such as curated "recipes" for switching tools and local events that help people move towards more independent digital infrastructure. Speaking personally, I do not have objections to the initiative itself, and I agree that its general goals are well aligned with many of the values behind XMPP. At the same time, it would be wrong to assume that no one else might have reservations, or different ideas about how (or whether) XSF should associate itself with it. That in itself is a key reason for involving the members-list. I would also like to suggest that we take a bit of time to think about how we engage, rather than focusing on a simple public endorsement. At the moment, the initiative does not list XMPP-specific content or any of our projects. Promoting it outwardly in its current form may be nice, but arguably does little to directly benefit our members, our ecosystem, or our projects. Instead, I believe we may get much more value by first looking at ways to leverage this initiative for our community. For example: - Projects like Snikket or Quicksy could explore whether they qualify to be added as a "recipe" on the DI.DAY website. - Even for projects not on the DI.DAY website, we can probably think of ways to piggy-back on the initiative in a sensible way. - Some projects might want to participate in or align with the initiative's recurring local events that help people switch tools and platforms. The Communications Team could initially focus on reaching out within our ecosystem, making projects aware of the initiative and helping them engage with it where it makes sense. From my perspective, that kind of engagement would be far more meaningful than a token message of support for an initiative that does not yet reference our work. I am very interested in hearing other views on this - both regarding potential concerns, and ideas for more effective or mutually beneficial ways of associating ourselves with DI.DAY. Kind regards, Guus On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 7:45 PM E.M. <emus(a)mailbox.org> wrote:

Hi all, I do not know how we/you can use that, but ... ... keywords and goals of "Save Social - Networks for Democracy" align very much with our weblin.io project, were we have been using XMPP for a long time to create a chat client with animated avatars that lets people meet on web pages. So, it's a social network without being a Social Media Silo it's based in europe, it's open source, does not require a login or profile, does not require you to pay by profile data in order to talk to people, works everywhere. There is no dedicated domain like facebook, x, tiktok. It makes every web page a place where peole meet and talk, any web page, enabling communication on the long tail of the web, where like minded people meet because they visit the same pages.. Reclaim the Web. The Web is the Metaverse. All that aligns greatly with Di.Day's goals. Of course, I also support XMPP in general for Di.Day. Just wanted to mention a concrete XMPP based project that fits. Best hw -- Dr. Heiner Wolf Autor, Dev, Agile Coach, CTO On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 at 22:44, Guus der Kinderen < guus.der.kinderen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hello everyone, > > For those who may not be familiar with it (I wasn't until looking into it > tonight), Digital Independence Day (DI.DAY) is a German initiative by "Save > Social - Networks for Democracy" that aims to raise awareness around > digital sovereignty, vendor independence, and alternatives to centralized > platforms. The campaign combines public messaging with practical actions, > such as curated "recipes" for switching tools and local events that help > people move towards more independent digital infrastructure. > > Speaking personally, I do not have objections to the initiative itself, > and I agree that its general goals are well aligned with many of the values > behind XMPP. At the same time, it would be wrong to assume that no one else > might have reservations, or different ideas about how (or whether) XSF > should associate itself with it. That in itself is a key reason for > involving the members-list. > > I would also like to suggest that we take a bit of time to think about > how we engage, rather than focusing on a simple public endorsement. At the > moment, the initiative does not list XMPP-specific content or any of our > projects. Promoting it outwardly in its current form may be nice, but > arguably does little to directly benefit our members, our ecosystem, or our > projects. > > Instead, I believe we may get much more value by first looking at ways to > leverage this initiative for our community. For example: > > - Projects like Snikket or Quicksy could explore whether they qualify > to be added as a "recipe" on the DI.DAY website. > - Even for projects not on the DI.DAY website, we can probably think > of ways to piggy-back on the initiative in a sensible way. > - Some projects might want to participate in or align with the > initiative's recurring local events that help people switch tools and > platforms. > > The Communications Team could initially focus on reaching out within our > ecosystem, making projects aware of the initiative and helping them engage > with it where it makes sense. From my perspective, that kind of engagement > would be far more meaningful than a token message of support for an > initiative that does not yet reference our work. > > I am very interested in hearing other views on this - both regarding > potential concerns, and ideas for more effective or mutually beneficial > ways of associating ourselves with DI.DAY. > > Kind regards, > > Guus > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 7:45 PM E.M. &lt;emus(a)mailbox.org&gt; wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> XSF Communication Team basically just intended to ask for permission >> from Board. But they ask us to reach out to all of you. So here we go! >> >> Currently there is a new initiative going on from Save Social – Networks >> For Democracy. It's called the Digital Independence Day - Di.Day in >> Germany. https://di.day/en (Sorry, no English version yet) >> >> While XMPP members already contacted them to list XMPP as recommended >> technology as well (we were not involved). Though, we think it is a good >> thing, we wanted to ask if anything speaks against supporting this >> campaign and aloow higher presence of XMPP as technology? >> >> We are basically asking whether we can write messages in the media >> channels like this: >> ________________ >> In Germany the word spreads for the "Digital Independence Day" >> (https://di.day), and we also find vendor-independent messaging great! >> >> Coincidentally, the first ‘DI.DAY’ was on the anniversary of XMPP, >> January 4th! >> >> So let's go for digital independence and sovereignty! >> ________________ >> >> We believe this could get us certain media attention in a significant >> big media campaign in Germany. >> >> Best regards, >> Eddie >> >