Hi,
I noticed that, in the current implementations of XEP-0444 are not really
backwards-compatible. Non-compliant clients completely miss the emoji
reactions and the users are completely unaware that the reaction has been
sent.
One idea would be to provide the following as a fallback:
> Content of the original message
😀
in a similar way to how message replies are currently shown on non-compliant
clients. Similarly, when an OMEMO-incompliant client receives an OMEMO-
encrypted message, it still receives some placeholder message indicating that
the message is OMEMO-encrypted but the client does not support it.
Is there any reason why there is currently no fallback mechanism in XEP-0444?
Regards,
Marcin
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Jingle Audio/Video Conferences
Abstract:
This specification defines a way to hold multiparty conferences with
an SFU via Jingle.
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/av_conferences.html
The Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept this
proposal as an official XEP.
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Client Access Management
Abstract:
This specification details how an XMPP account owner can view and
control which applications and services have access to their account.
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/xep-client-access-
management.html
The Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept this
proposal as an official XEP.
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: OAuth Client Login
Abstract:
This specification details how a third-party can be securely granted
access to an XMPP account without exposing the account credentials,
using OAuth.
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/xep-oauth-client-login.html
The Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept this
proposal as an official XEP.
Version 1.0.2 of XEP-0388 (Extensible SASL Profile) has been released.
Abstract:
This document describes a replacement for the SASL profile documented
in RFC 6120 which allows for greater extensibility.
Changelog:
* Fix various invalid examples.
* Fix the XML Schema to match examples. (egp)
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0388.html
Note: The information in the XEP list at https://xmpp.org/extensions/
is updated by a separate automated process and may be stale at the
time this email is sent. The XEP documents linked herein are up-to-
date.
Version 1.35.0 of XEP-0045 (Multi-User Chat) has been released.
Abstract:
This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension for multi-user
text chat, whereby multiple XMPP users can exchange messages in the
context of a room or channel, similar to Internet Relay Chat (IRC). In
addition to standard chatroom features such as room topics and
invitations, the protocol defines a strong room control model,
including the ability to kick and ban users, to name room moderators
and administrators, to require membership or passwords in order to
join the room, etc.
Changelog:
* Remove references to using resourceparts when banning users.
* Explicitly disallow Ban List modifications that clash with 'Banning
a User' conditions.
* Status code purpose no longer hints that recipient is the affected
user
* Improved 'Service Removes Non-Member' example.
* Clarify usage of presence stanzas when removing a non-member from a
members-only room.
* Replace inappropriate RFC 2119 key word usage in §9.7.
* Presence sent to occupants of a destroyed room includes a <destroy/>
element.
* Explicitly use bare JIDs when operating on affiliations.
* Allow non-owners to retrieve owner and admin lists in non-anonymous
rooms.
* Members should be allowed to retrieve the member list only in non-
anonymous rooms. (gk)
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html
Note: The information in the XEP list at https://xmpp.org/extensions/
is updated by a separate automated process and may be stale at the
time this email is sent. The XEP documents linked herein are up-to-
date.
Good morning Council Members,
the next XMPP Council Meeting will take place on, Tuesday, August 20
2024 at 16:00 UTC in xmpp:council@muc.xmpp.org?join
The Agenda is as follows:
1) Roll call
2) Agenda Bashing
3) Editors update
none
4) Items for voting
a) XEP-0045: Presence sent to occupants of a destroyed room includes a
<destroy/>
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1365
Let’s come to an agreement here that includes the wording for the note.
b) XEP-0388: Fix the XML Schema and examples
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1369
c) XEP-0045: Explicitly use bare JIDs when operating on affiliations
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1371
d) XEP-0045: Allow non-owners to retrieve owner and admin lists in
non-anonymous rooms
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1372
e) XEP-0402: Specify what clients should do if autojoin='0' in
bookmark notifications
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1373
5) Pending votes
Technically some people on 'XEP-0045: Presence sent to occupants of a
destroyed room includes a <destroy/>' but there is a new items for
voting for that after the PR was modified.
See the spreadsheet of Doom:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1H310M8z6Kdo6XyNf2DwafzrSLuwhaLNvzfa…
6) Date of Next
7) AOB
8) Close
Version 0.2.0 of XEP-0478 (Stream Limits Advertisement) has been
released.
Abstract:
This specification defines a way for an XMPP entity to announce the
limits it will enforce for data received on a stream.
Changelog:
* Add the XML Schema.
* Clarify that both children can be optional.
* Fix indentation and one typo. (egp)
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0478.html
Note: The information in the XEP list at https://xmpp.org/extensions/
is updated by a separate automated process and may be stale at the
time this email is sent. The XEP documents linked herein are up-to-
date.
Version 1.0.1 of XEP-0386 (Bind 2) has been released.
Abstract:
This specification provides a single-request replacement for several
activities an XMPP client needs to do at startup.
Changelog:
Add an XML Schema. (egp)
URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0386.html
Note: The information in the XEP list at https://xmpp.org/extensions/
is updated by a separate automated process and may be stale at the
time this email is sent. The XEP documents linked herein are up-to-
date.
