- Standards

Proposed XMPP Extension: Data Forms File Input Element

by Daniel Gultsch

The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. Title: Data Forms File Input Element Abstract: This specification defines an element which can be used with data forms to let users upload one or more files. URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/data-form-file-element.html The Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept this proposal as an official XEP.

4 months

3
2
0 0

XEP-0317: Hats, Update and complete the protocol

by Timothée Jaussoin

A few weeks ago I made an important pull request to complete, fix and update the XEP-0317: Hats. https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1437 This PR included the following changes: * Specify a urn:xmpp:hats:commands:dcreate command to add a hat to the available list * Specify a urn:xmpp:hats:commands:ddestroy command to destroy a hat from the list * Clarify how the service should broadcast the hat changes when it is edited, assigned, removed or destroyed * Specify a way for an entity to get the complete list of hats using a hash in disco#info * Add a hue optional parameter allowing entities to assign a color to the hat that can be displayed properly in any conditions on the client (as explained in XEP-0392: Consistent Color Generation) * Standardize all the form fields using XEP-0068 * Fix some typos I tried to reach the authors without success so I'm trying again using the mailing list. I'd really like to move it forward then we can start implementing them in our clients and servers. Regards, edhelas

4 months

3
4
0 0

XEP-0461 feedback: multi-message replies

by Greatsword

I've seen some IM platforms (namely Revolt and Guilded) have the ability to let the user reference multiple messages in a single reply, which might be a useful feature. I think with the XEP as it currently is, it could be fairly simple to add support for this feature. I think an addition like this would be good. """ Section 3.2 - Multi-Message Replies A user may want to reply to multiple messages with a single message. This can be done by including many reply elements. Ordering is important, so the reply element MUST include an "arrangement" attribute that counts up from 0, with 0 being displayed at the top in the client UI. EXAMPLE 5. Yuri replies to both Max's and Anna's messages in a MUC. ``` <message to='knightsguild(a)muc.example.org' from='knightsguild(a)muc.example.org/anna' id='groupchat-id1' type='groupchat'> <stanza-id xmlns='urn:xmpp:sid:0' id='groupchat-id1' /> <body>A fort will keep us safe!</body> </message> <message to='knightsguild(a)muc.example.org' from='knightsguild(a)muc.example.org/max' id='groupchat-id2' type='groupchat'> <stanza-id xmlns='urn:xmpp:sid:0' id='groupchat-id2' /> <body>Adoring blue flags for style!</body> </message> <message to='knightsguild(a)muc.example.org' from='knightsguild(a)muc.example.org/yuri' id='groupchat-id3' type='groupchat'> <stanza-id xmlns='urn:xmpp:sid:0' id='groupchat-id3' /> <body>Excellent ideas! Let's get right to it!</body> <reply to='knightsguild(a)muc.example.org/anna' id='groupchat-id1' arrangement='0' xmlns='urn:xmpp:reply:0' /><reply to='knightsguild(a)muc.example.org/max' id='groupchat-id2' arrangement='1' xmlns='urn:xmpp:reply:0' /> </message> ``` A fallback for this would work in the same way as the previous section, the main difference is that the fallback would include all referenced messages. """ I think it also might be worth considering having some kind of limiter in how many messages can be referenced by one reply - perhaps MUCs that advertise support for replies could indicate in a data form how many references may be one message, and if clients don't self-enforce this, then the MUC could throw a policy violation error and drop the message.

4 months

4
8
0 0

Enhancing privacy for BoB messages (XEP-0231)

by Schimon Jehudah

Good day. I would want to discuss the possibility and best practice of creating server-side modules that would copy BoB data (XEP-0231: Bits of Binary) to own server in order to avoid exposure of IP address of the receiver. Kind regards, Schimon

4 months, 1 week

6
11
0 0

XMPP Council Agenda 2025-06-24

by Daniel Gultsch

Good Morning Council Members, the next XMPP Council Meeting will take place on, Tuesday, June 24 2025 at 15:30 UTC in xmpp:council@muc.xmpp.org?join The Agenda is as follows: 1) Roll call 2) Agenda Bashing 3) Editors update - UPDATED: XEP-0284 (Shared XML Editing) https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0284.html 4) Items for voting a) XEP-0363: specify purpose/buckets when requesting slots https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1445 5) Pending votes - Dan on everything from last week - Daniel on 'Proposed XMPP Extension: Data Forms File Input Element' - Goffi, technically on 'XEP-0388: Fix failure example sequence' but has been vetoed already in favor of "Should Daniel just fix the schema" See the spreadsheet of doom: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oAHUqBdlkobDcmfQ-YRMfZHGQLMWEdOFuEU… 6) Date of Next 7) AOB 8) Close

4 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

UPDATED: XEP-0284 (Shared XML Editing)

by Daniel Gultsch

Version 0.1.4 of XEP-0284 (Shared XML Editing) has been released. Abstract: This specification defines a protocol that enables two or more endpoints to collaboratively edit an XML object. The protocol is intended for use mainly over the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP), either by existing instant messaging clients or by specialized editing clients. However, the protocol could also be used over a direct TCP connection rather than over XMPP. Changelog: * Fix the registrar section. * Format the glossary better. * Add missing <state/> wrappers in examples. * Write an XML Schema. (egp) URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0284.html Note: The information in the XEP list at https://xmpp.org/extensions/ is updated by a separate automated process and may be stale at the time this email is sent. The XEP documents linked herein are up-to- date.

4 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Selective advertizing of activity and mood (XEP-0107 and XEP-0108)

by Schimon Jehudah

Greetings. Preface ------- I would want to advise to extend XEP-0107 (User Mood) and XEP-0108 (User Activity), so that it would be possible to selectively advertize of activities and moods. This is beneficial for both humans and machines. Because the examples for humans may be vague, I will write an obvious case for machines. Service ------- KaikOut is a moderation service (i.e. "bot", so called) for group chats. As with traffic signs, and unlike status messages, activity and mood are fixated, even though both have an option for custom text, and because of it, they can be used as constant and accurate indicators for activity and state of machines. That is, activities and moods can be used as signs, and also to signal of events. See further examples. Additionally, status messages, activities and moods serve different purposes, which is another reason to have an option of selective advertizing for activity and mood. Example ------- This is a realization of using activities and moods in a selective fashion over different group chats simultaneously. Ideas with XEP-0107: User Mood ------------------------------ amorous: When KaikOut writes good scores. annoyed: When KaikOut writes bad scores. ashamed: When KaikOut demotes a moderator. calm or bored: When group activity is under a certain level. happy or relaxed: When moderation activity is under a certain level. restless: When moderation activity is above a certain level. cautious or serious: Routine mood. remorseful or frustrated or sleepy: When KaikOut is disabled. proud: When KaikOut bans or kicks an occupant. ashamed or shocked: When a group chat owner pormotes a moderator which was demoted by KaikOut. surprised: When KaikOut is demoted. thankful: When KaikOut is set to be a moderator. Ideas with XEP-0108: User Activity ---------------------------------- working: When KaikOut writes scores. sleeping: When KaikOut is inactive. Reference: https://git.xmpp-it.net/sch/KaikOut/issues/36 Kind regards, Schimon

4 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

XSF membership application period Q3 2025

by Alexander Gnauck

I have setup the membership application Wiki page for the application period Q3 2025 Applications are encouraged from developers and others who are actively involved in the Jabber/XMPP community. To apply, create a page about yourself on the Wiki: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Membership_Applications_Q3_2025 If you don't have a wiki account, send your full name, preferred nickname and email address to me or one of the other Sysops: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Sysops Apply now!!! Thanks, Alex

4 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

XMPP Council Agenda 2025-06-17

by Daniel Gultsch

Good Morning Council Members, the next XMPP Council Meeting will take place on, Tuesday, June 17 2025 at 15:30 UTC in xmpp:council@muc.xmpp.org?join The Agenda is as follows: 1) Roll call 2) Agenda Bashing 3) Editors update - UPDATED: XEP-0384 (OMEMO Encryption) https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0384.html - UPDATED: XEP-0388 (Extensible SASL Profile) https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0388.html - UPDATED: XEP-0485 (PubSub Server Information) https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0485.html - UPDATED: XEP-0498 (Pubsub File Sharing) https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0498.html - Proposed XMPP Extension: Data Policy https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/data_policy.html - Proposed XMPP Extension: Data Forms File Input Element https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/data-form-file-element.html 4) Items for voting a) XEP-0388: Fix failure example sequence https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1411 b) XEP-0080: Add "regioncode" element https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1442 c) Proposed XMPP Extension: Data Policy https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/data_policy.html d) Proposed XMPP Extension: Data Forms File Input Element https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/data-form-file-element.html 5) Pending votes none See the spreadsheet of doom: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oAHUqBdlkobDcmfQ-YRMfZHGQLMWEdOFuEU… 6) Date of Next 7) AOB 8) Close

4 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

RFC 6121 section 8.5 "active resource" and "Connected Resource"

by Guus der Kinderen

Hi, Section 8.5.4 provides a summary of earlier sections. It uses the term "active resource" twice. This term is not used in any of the earlier sections. Conversely, the earlier sections use the term "Connected Resource" a couple of times. A "Connected Resource" is defined by RFC6121/6120 as "[has] bound a resource to the stream" Although the term "Connected Resource" is used in section 8.5, none of the specifications therein seem to apply to Connected Resources. The usage of the term "active resource" in section 8.5.4 could be an artifact of RFC3921/3920, which defines an "active resource" as: "Upon establishing a session, a connected resource (in the terminology of [XMPP-CORE]) is said to be an "active resource." Although section 8.5 advertises that it will define how stanzas related to connected resources are to be processed ("If there is at least one available resource or connected resource, how the stanza is processed depends on the stanza type.") it does not seem to do that. All definitions seem to depend on having at least one available resource (which is defined as a connected resource that has sent initial presence), leaving scenarios in which only connected resources are present, undefined. Am I misinterpreting this? If not, is this something that should be cleared up (or explicitly be left undefined)? As a practical example of a question that I believe is left unanswered: How should a server process a message stanza of type 'normal', addressed to a bare JID that represents a local user (the scenario of section 8.5.2.1.1 of RFC 6121) if the corresponding user only has one or more Connected Resources (but not any Available Resources)? I believe that there are many possible variations on this question, I'm limiting it to one to illustrate the larger issue that I described in this email. For additional context: this was discussed in the XSF's Discussion MUC earlier. Logs of that conversation can be found at https://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/2025-05-28#2025-05-28-a5d887bd6428222c Kind regards, Guus

4 months, 2 weeks

5
5
0 0

2025

2024

2023

Standards