[Standards] Re: [Board] Board meeting info + voting

Hi Goffi, I'm not sure if I'm understanding your disagreement? I was trying to say that I hope that Board could find a compromise (which I think is what you're also saying) so that one proposal (that facilitates existing processes) does not need to be delayed/postponed until another proposal (to migrate such processes to different infrastructure) has been worked out. In that sense "one [proposal] should not need to block the other [proposal]" in the sense that both can be developed in parallel. I was certainly not trying to imply that people are blocking each-other, if that is how my comment came across. Kind regards, Guus