7 Oct
2025
7 Oct
'25
10:06 p.m.
While I do appreciate some of the publication of IETF, I do not think
that it deserves any attention, especially not our attention, of the
people of XMPP, for the IETF has rejected Atomsub (Atom Over XMPP).
I do sense, that we should further incorporate more PPN (Peer-to-peer
Network) means into XMPP, and let thise "HTTP people" to "play" with
their own "soup", for a lack of a better phrase.
Lest forget that in the past those organizations have formed the
"Peer-to-peer Working Group" (peer-to-peerwg.org) in order to gradually
suppress P2P, not to promote it.
Schimon
On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 13:42:31 -0600
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter(a)stpeter.im> wrote:
No, the subject line of this message is not a joke.
:-)
The IETF has formed a "TIPTOP" working group to study and adapt
Internet protocols for communication over interplanetary distances.
[1] If anyone here is interested in this topic, I encourage you read
their documents [2] and sign up for their email discussion list [3].
Thanks for your attention!
Peter
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tiptop/about/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tiptop/documents/
[3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/deepspace/
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- standards(a)xmpp.org
To unsubscribe send an email to standards-leave(a)xmpp.org