12 May
2026
12 May
'26
12:57 p.m.
To me, AI is just a tool that helps you work on text. Person who uses it
still has the final say on what is being submitted. Thus, just like nobody
cares about texts being processed with other tools — spellcheckers, text
processors, XMP beautifiers, etc. —nobody should care about how the text
was produced, even if LLM generated the entire section (in fact, the last 4
words were generated by Gmail's auto-suggestion to use active voice, and it
replaced my previous phrasing).
So, i my opinion, the best course is to ignore capabilities of modern
models and just let the submitters be responsible for what they authored in
whatever way they like. Also, I don't think that LLM involvement can be
reliably proved anyway, so ....
On Mon, 11 May 2026 at 12:50, Goffi <goffi(a)goffi.org> wrote:
Hello everybody,
I would like to bring a discussion on AI policy. We can't really ignore
anymore that modern models have become very capable, and I suspect that
they
are used for spec authoring.
--
Andrew Nenakhov
https://redsolution.com <http://www.redsolution.com>