On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 at 14:55, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter(a)stpeter.im> wrote:
  On 10/20/25 4:46 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
  At minimum, I think a document, somewhere, should
provide advice on what
 security stuff to implement and why in 2025, and include the MTIs for
 such things, and be kept current. 
 It sounds like we need a replacement for RFC 7590, which was published
 in June 2015. The IETF's UTA WG is still operational, so the work could
 happen there; alternatively, we could publish a XEP (easier to update),
 although we might want to coordinate with the UTA WG chairs to at least
 inform them of the effort at the XSF.
 
I'll take "RFCs I have forgotten about" for 400, Peter.
But yes, that one, but with SASL and Channel Bindings and such things.
Dave.