[Members] XSF Board Meeting minutes

Ben Schumacher bschumac at cisco.com
Fri Oct 21 13:46:55 UTC 2011


On 10/21/11 12:47 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Peter Saint-Andre<stpeter at stpeter.im>  wrote:
>> On 10/20/11 3:51 PM, bear wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 16:38, Peter Saint-Andre<stpeter at stpeter.im>  wrote:
>>>> On 10/20/11 1:55 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Peter Saint-Andre<stpeter at stpeter.im>  wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/18/11 2:32 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:29 PM, bear<bear42 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>>>>> - email is being sent to Alex to inquire about when the mystery board
>>>>>>>> person sent their email. This will decide if the board proposes one of
>>>>>>>> the following:
>>>>>>>>   (1): Reopens applications until (i.e.) Sunday. All existing votes
>>>>>>>> will be cleared and the process restarted.
>>>>>>>>   (2): Reset all existing votes and restart the voting process without
>>>>>>>> the mystery board member and Waqas.
>>>>>>> Did anything come of this?
>>>>>> I'm sorry if I caused trouble by mis-communicating deadlines to several
>>>>>> of the applicants. :(
>>>>> Well - it just needs the current election to be fixed. My
>>>>> understanding from the Board meeting is that if it came to light that
>>>>> it hadn't been the candidates' fault that they were late (and from
>>>>> what I've heard it sounds like it may well not have been) that we'd
>>>>> propose re-opening applications for a week or so, and to then restart
>>>>> the election, and check that the Membership were happy with this. It's
>>>>> all gone quiet since then, though...
>>>> I agree. If desired, I can make an executive decision and ask Alex to
>>>> make it so. :)
>>> yes please
>> I have asked Alex off-list to start the voting again with all of the
>> candidates listed on the wiki, and to choose a new meeting date (perhaps
>> the week of November 7).
> And to re-open applications for a ~week?
>
>

It's still not clear to me why this was necessary -- folks who were 
interested in Board and Council should have been able to meet the 
original deadlines. From what I've seen, there's nothing that points to 
any extenuating circumstances that prevented them from being able to do so.

Can anybody clarify this for me and the rest of members?

Thanks,
Ben


More information about the Members mailing list