[standards-jig] JEP-0001 suggested change

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Jul 31 21:06:26 UTC 2002


I'm agreeable. No JEP approved so far has had less than a majority of +1
votes, but this makes sense for the future.

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.html

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Joe Hildebrand wrote:

> If we are considering changes to JEP-0001, what about a change to the voting
> process, so that a JEP only passes if a majority of the council votes +1.
> Today, if everyone votes 0, the JEP still passes.  -1 could still be a veto.
> 
> -- 
> Joe Hildebrand
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig
> 




More information about the Standards mailing list