[Standards-JIG] Re: Re: proto-JEP: Stream Acking
jajcus at bnet.pl
Fri Oct 29 12:02:19 UTC 2004
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 03:47:10AM -0500, Nolan Eakins wrote:
> Examples should be added for this then, and maybe make it SUGGESTED...if
> that is a a conformance term (probably should be SHOULD). If the
> negotiation scheme I described can be used so the stream doesn't have to be
> restarted, that'll have to be described somewhere. Hopefully in this JEP.
Entinty may declare a namespace prefix for ACK protocol in the initial
<stream:stream/> tag and negotiate the feature in the regular way (using
<stream:features/>). If the feature is not negotiated the prefix will
not be used any more, but it won't hurt.
More information about the Standards