[Standards-JIG] XMPP URIs was: Two questions regardingJEP-0124HTTP Binding

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Dec 7 17:47:29 UTC 2005


Trejkaz wrote:
> On Saturday 03 December 2005 04:09, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I think (3) is a non-starter. I don't like the confusing aspect of (2)
>> and personally I doubt that this spec will ever be used for non-XMPP
>> connections, so I prefer (1). Have I missed any pros and cons?
> 
> Is there a problem with doing this the "XML way" and introducing an optional 
> attribute which holds the port number?

Backwards compatibility.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20051207/858eba88/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list