[Standards-JIG] FW: Jingle - P2P and PBX calls

Scott Ludwig scottlu at google.com
Fri Dec 23 19:20:46 UTC 2005


> Gatewaying is different from the session type though, right?

Yes, gatewaying is different than session types.

> Ideally,
> JEP-0167 would work for any kind of audio, not just XMPP<->XMPP.

JEP-0167 can be gatewayed to SIP, IAX, etc.

> I would expect it to be possible to make a gateway, such that a client could
> perform Jingle-Audio to a JID: "+18002553700 at pots.jabber.org".  Literally it
> would be just like any other transport, and the client would know nothing of
> SIP or PBXs, even if those are what actually get used in the end.

Yes, that's right. That's how a gateway should work from a client's
point of view - transparently.

Scott

>
> -Justin
>
> On Friday 23 December 2005 09:24, Scott Ludwig wrote:
> > JEP-0166 is a generic service for negotiating a session and
> > establishing and maintaining p2p streams between two end points
> > through NATs and firewalls.
> >
> > JEP-0167 is a specific session type for audio, that uses JEP-0166 for
> > sesssion signaling and p2p stream establishment.
> >
> > Anything that can be sent over a stream is fair game for a new session
> > type..
> >
> > If you want to plug in a PBX, so you can have a Jingle client on one
> > side, and some other (non-Jingle) phone on the other side, you need a
> > gateway that knows how to translate the signaling, end point
> > addressing, and potentially media format if something other than RTP
> > is needed. There will be a Jingle-SIP JEP upcoming that describes this
> > gatewaying for SIP. Likewise for IAX and H.323.
> >
> > Asterisk will get this gatewaying knowledge built into to it (ideally :-)).
> >
> > Does that answer the question?
> >
> > On 12/23/05, Hal Rottenberg <halr9000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 12/23/05, Simon Guindon <simon.guindon at tomahawk.ca> wrote:
> > > > As far as Jingle-IAX. I guess this is what I'm initially talking about.
> > > > Do we need a Jingle-IAX or can the current Jingle accommodate what is
> > > > required for PBX like call setups. And if not, can it be slightly
> > > > tweaked, or is a whole new addition required as you mention Jingle-IAX?
> > >
> > > Maybe this would help: s/Jingle/Jingle Signalling/
> > >
> > > The way I understand it you have been talking about JEP-0167 Jingle
> > > Audio, when you need to be talking about JEP-0166 Jingle Signalling.
> > > I think you would have a new JEP for IAX and it would look similar to
> > > JEP-0167?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org)
> > > im:hal at jabber.rocks.cc
> > > http://halr9000.com
> >
> > !DSPAM:43ac370a190051050621154!
>



More information about the Standards mailing list