[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-112 (User Physical Geolocation): Extra URL field

Maciek Niedzielski machekku at miroku.uaznia.net
Sun Feb 5 19:15:14 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Remko Troncon wrote:
> 
> On 05 Feb 2006, at 16:42, Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
> 
>> I think there is an example with jabber:x:oob in geoloc JEP. Why not to
>> do the same with this one?
> 
> There is indeed an example where a regular message is sent with an oob
> element.

Ah right, sorry. I was writing from what I remember, without checking
the JEP today.


> However, it's not clear to me why a historical namespace
> would be used in a standards-track jep

To "reuse existing jabber protocols wherever possible"? ;)

- --
Maciek
 xmpp:machekku at chrome.pl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFD5k7B7knNPWzAbeURAi3pAJ983+EmhSErf7XPOBuA4LnHoKoQIACfUe/E
Ew//dghTyyl4n1w94iDNZ74=
=I6yo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Standards mailing list