[Standards-JIG] Jingle vs. Zoep
dgriffioen at voipster.com
Wed Feb 8 22:33:51 UTC 2006
Nolan Eakins wrote:
> dirk.griffioen at voipster.com wrote:
>> Could you maybe elaborate a little on 'that's not the case here'? As
>> is, it feels like an unargumented qualification (no offense meant :-) ).
> With Zoep you have to include an XMPP library that supports Zoep, SIP,
> SDP, RTP, and a number of codecs included in or alongside the client.
> With Jingle you just need a Jingle aware XMPP library, RTP, and the
> I would also imagine that SIP libraries would get more complex as all
> of the SIMPLE extensions get included as well. Jingle also makes my
> life easier too, as all I have to do is either develop or find an RTP
> library to use. Adding Jingle is just a matter of traversing some
> DOMs, spitting out XML, and setting up the RTP lib.
> - Nolan
But then you want to talk to a (proper) phone -
So yes you need a proper SIP implementation, and no, you do not need
SIMPLE (it aint :-) )
All you need is an XMPP lib (as Zoep is just XMPP) and you would use it
to pass SIP around. The SIP message would be dealt with in a similar way
as you are walking a DOM, I'd set some callbacks and be told what needs
to happen: kick my RTP
There seems to be some confusion (maybe on my part): we try to combine
what would seem two worlds, instead of recreating one in the other, as,
to me, both Jabber and SIP have been doing.
More information about the Standards