[Standards-JIG] Stream compression (JEP-138) and notificationof failure or success (repost from JSF Members)

Peter Millard pgmillard at gmail.com
Wed Jan 11 17:35:38 UTC 2006


Agreed.. With implementations already working and inter-oping, it
seems just clarifying the JEP is in order, not breaking all of these
inter-oping clients and servers :)

pgm.

On 1/11/06, JD Conley <jd.conley at coversant.net> wrote:
> > Maybe changing it to <success/> would be better, but I wonder how much
> > we're really gaining by changing the element name.
>
> I agree. At this point we have at least seven compatible implementations
> of the current protocol. Clarifying the wording would be best.
>
> -JD Conley
>


--
Got Jabber? <www.jabber.org>



More information about the Standards mailing list