[Standards-JIG] screen sharing & remote control

Boyd Fletcher boyd.fletcher at je.jfcom.mil
Fri Oct 13 11:04:04 UTC 2006


we are also doing something along the same lines and have been funding the
OpenMCU developer Craig Southeren to implement SRTP into OpenMCU. We were
planning on using SRTP to send both multi user audio and application
casting/sharing data and use XMPP for the control channel.

boyd



On 10/13/06 3:13 AM, "Hugues Pisapia" <huguespisapia at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi there,
> 
> Actually, we are working on something similar in my company: sitting
> on top of MUC, we want to be able to present media and share control
> of the media to some of the room occupants.
> 
> This is currently sitting on top of MUC and I was planning to deliver
> this as a XEP. I'll try to post something today, or early next week to
> the XEP inbox.
> 
> - Hugues
> 
> On 10/13/06, Michal 'vorner' Vaner <michal.vaner at kdemail.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:39:45PM -0400, Hal Rottenberg wrote:
>>> A user on the Psi forums recently brought up the idea of integrating
>>> Psi with VNC.  VNC [1] for those who are not aware, is an method of
>>> sharing and/or remotely controlling a computer display.  I'm just
>>> playing with the idea in my head, and I'm wondering if anyone has
>>> thought any further on this before?
>> 
>> May be a nice feature.
>> 
>> I hope at last as a plugin. I do not like the idea of having it compiled
>> if I do not use it (I use ssh and X11 forwarding to run remotely only
>> the one needed program).
>> 
>> OT: Anyway, I had similar idea - VPN with selected contacts - and get
>> hamachi out of business.
>> 
>>> Would Jingle be used to negotiate a session?
>>> 
>>> I'll ask this of Chris: should such a protocol be mapped to MUC?  :)
>> 
>> You do not want to do the payload trough MUC, do you? The payload are
>> data that:
>> *) Need to be delivered relatively fast
>> *) Are not text
>> *) May be huge amount of them, you would flood the server easilly
>> 
>> I guess at last the picture data should be p2p trough jingle.
>> 
>>> I actually think this would apply.  It's very similar to shared XML
>>> editing / whiteboarding in that respect.  Of course this is much
>>> different in that there is no XML involved in the actual data, it's
>>> all framebuffers and pixel maps.
>>> 
>>> Just something worth thinking about perhaps.
>>> 
>>> [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VNC
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> There is one difference between linux and windows.
>> With windows, you pay for the software, but you get all the T-shirts for
>> free.
>> With linux, you get all the software for free, but you buy the T-shirts.
>> 
>> Michal "vorner" Vaner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 



More information about the Standards mailing list