[Standards-JIG] Re: xmpp.org Namespaces
hildjj at gmail.com
Mon Oct 16 22:19:20 UTC 2006
According to RFC 3406, we could just use:
From section 4.3:
"The RFC need not be standards-track, but it will be subject to IESG
review and acceptance pursuant to the guidelines..."
It looks like Appendix A has all of the stuff that's needed, and that
we send it to urn-nid at apps.ietf.org to get started.
But I agree, it makes sense to wait until after the San Diego meeting
to submit something.
On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>> Alternately, we could think about registering a URN namespace here:
>> And then future namespaces could look like:
> I think that would be a beautiful thing.
> One of these days I'll look into it more seriously. We'd need an RFC
> defining it, and the -00 cutoff date has passed, so there's no huge
> hurry (probably I'll work on it in a week or two).
More information about the Standards