[Standards] NEW: XEP-0224 (Attention)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Fri Aug 10 21:20:07 UTC 2007


Andreas Monitzer wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2007, at 23:05, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> 
>> On 8/11/07, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
>>> Sergei Golovan wrote:
>>> OK then:
>>>
>>> But the recipient's client must send a reply if we use IQ, which seems
>>> wasteful for a little toy like this.
>>
>> Well, the first working draft of this toy (IQ-based, with a mandatory
>> reply) consists of 67 lines of code. Is it too wasteful?
> 
> I think he's talking about the network transfer waste, not the coding
> waste. Since all clients need some kind of handling sending iqs and
> receiving them, this is not really a concern.

Right. As I said in the jdev room (and I quote):

[13:14:06] <stpeter> OMG you want a reliable transport for your stupid
buzz messages?!?!


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7354 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20070810/5570185a/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list