[Standards] SASL Plain - AuthID - Bare JID or User Name?
mridul at sun.com
Thu Feb 8 20:24:16 UTC 2007
Chris Mullins wrote:
> We just ran into a problem doing Authentication with WildFire using
> the Open Source SoapBox Framework and SASL Plain.
> The SoapBox Framework is using a bare JID (“user at server”) as the
> authid that’s passed across the link. The Jive server is expecting
> only a user name (“user”).
> The RFC doesn’t really say either way, and I figure this is a good
> chance to get it clarified.
> (The SoapBox Framework now can do both, but I would sure prefer just
> one or the other)
> Chris Mullins
I am not sure why you need user at domain as the uid ...
The domain is specified in the 'to' in the stream : so only uid should
Since the spec is slightly ambiguous, we support both as of now (in most
cases) - but I am going to remove that pretty soon.
More information about the Standards