[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0220 (Server Dialback)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Apr 14 13:41:53 UTC 2011


On 4/14/11 5:45 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>> Preferably, the receiving server would not include the old namespace
>>>> at all
>>>> on the stream in response to a 1.0 stream.  It just confuses matters.
>>>> And
>>>> on stream restarts, the old ns should not be used at all by either
>>>> side.
>>
>> Ah, I see what you mean -- if you *know* that the other side knows about
>> XMPP 1.0 then use the stream feature exclusively.
> 
> which is a problem because the dialback stream feature is an
> afterthought and not "xmpp 1.0".

Stream features are 1.0, but the dialback stream feature is not.

> I would propose to get rid of the first bullet (and associated text) in
> section 2.3. This "new" method of signalling support for dialback does
> not offer any advantages.
> That way, the stream feature is only used to signal support for dialback
> error handling.

I think that would be OK.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20110414/87511d6e/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list