[Standards] disco identity for "client/smartphone"?

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Mon Dec 3 08:30:55 UTC 2012


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Kozlov Konstantin <yagiza at yandex.ru> wrote:
> 30.11.2012, 12:26, "Kevin Smith" <kevin at kismith.co.uk>:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>>>  Looking at http://xmpp.org/registrar/disco-categories.html I notice
>>>  that we have disco identities for "client/handheld" (e.g., PDA) and
>>>  "client/phone" (e.g., mobile phone), but I think those are a bit
>>>  old-fashioned by now. We might want to add an identity for
>>>  "client/smartphone" (i.e., a phone that can do a lot more than the
>>>  old-style phones we had in mind when we defined "client/phone").
>>
>> If this thing is capable of running an XMPP client on it, it's a smartphone.
> Why?! Any cheap J2ME-enabled phone can run XMPP client without any problem.
> Usually we call "smartphones" only mobile devices with operating system (Symbian, Windows CE/Mobile/Phone, iOS or Android).
> So, if you call any Java-enabled mobile phone "smartphone", you should agree that no mobile phones produced today at all. Only smartphones!

Yes, that's the point - today's feature phones can do more than
yesterday's smart phones, so this distinction doesn't provide any
value that I can see. Distinguishing available features of clients is
provided through 115/30.

/K



More information about the Standards mailing list