[Standards] Veto on "Privileged Entity"
kurt.zeilenga at isode.com
Tue Dec 16 21:21:11 UTC 2014
> On Dec 16, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2014 20:23, "Kurt Zeilenga" <kurt.zeilenga at isode.com <mailto:kurt.zeilenga at isode.com>> wrote:
> > You have provided no suggestions to the authors of how they might take change the ProtoXEP to address your objections.
> Okay, I thought I had given the general actions I'd like to see, but I'll rephrase.
> The specification describes a very specific solution to a very specific problem, in a way that matches neither the status quo of existing patterns within XMPP, nor the common model and terms used elsewhere in the industry.
> I would like to see this recast to be based around the standard industry model and terms, with a view to ultimately allowing this model to be used throughout XMPP. I have described this model in loose terms in my initial email, and I'm happy to expand on this.
And can I draw the conclusion you think XACML is the “standard industry model and terms” specification that you want this work “recast” in?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards