[Standards] Veto on "Privileged Entity"

Kurt Zeilenga kurt.zeilenga at isode.com
Thu Dec 18 19:57:23 UTC 2014


I’ve reviewed this ProtoXEP and find it generally suitable for publication as a XEP.

A couple of comments:

The <forwarded/> element should be inside an application-specific element, otherwise the server cannot disguising forwarding per this spec vs forwarding per some other spec.
See bullet 5 of 3.2 of XEP 297.

PEP should be spelled out on first use and a citation provided.

Regards, Kurt






> On Dec 18, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter at andyet.net> wrote:
> 
> Goffi has sent an updated ProtoXEP to the editor team, which I have just uploaded:
> 
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/privilege-component.html
> 
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://andyet.com/




More information about the Standards mailing list