[Standards] XEP-0280: <private/> vs. <no-copy/>

Matthew A. Miller linuxwolf at outer-planes.net
Wed Sep 16 14:33:26 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

A pull request was submitted to remove <private/> and use the
<no-copy/> processing hint:  https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/83

The last time this came up, many many months ago, I recall there not
being consensus to change.  But that was then and this is now.

What are implementers doing today?

* Are implementations using XEP-0280's <private/>?
* Are implementations using XEP-0334's <no-copy/>?
* Are implementations supporting both, but favoring XEP-0334's <no-copy/
>?


- -- 
- - m&m

Matthew A. Miller
< http://goo.gl/LK55L >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV+X22AAoJEDWi+S0W7cO18pkH/A15oVS0iRyt0OTBLp2K1/YO
DCDCa3pq18psNjXrk1CNS3U/pC2uYlR3eHvMLEhAMqNA/btoF2WhVYo7P0aW06DQ
WzE/kGK9s+2C2s4pUb0iz0O0Q7m0AmRwfBPq4+YkpvORIHIO2anOGI6SmZ8uXncx
Nvz9SxYaa2PYFpgqsr7zaUWHxPlhf3rqafqYVER1NPWiVTPUasEoVoLrPT3Q704K
vo7O4sdWBZVgjTCZc7RHChc8GljxCzwHki/w3wG0dl3gNZ6byYL3JvgDxrv9Uvs5
rf0LZcTrdqTkKLoLr4SdcISvjzowrJN10M5gVHkPvQjgjt6ALYDtMYVzoACa9NI=
=2b16
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Standards mailing list