[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: XMPP Compliance Suites 2016

Thijs Alkemade me at thijsalkema.de
Tue May 10 19:28:01 UTC 2016

> On 28 apr. 2016, at 08:35, XMPP Extensions Editor <editor at xmpp.org> wrote:
> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
> Title: XMPP Compliance Suites 2016
> Abstract:
>      This document defines XMPP protocol compliance levels for 2016.
> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/compliance2016.html
> The XMPP Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept this proposal as an official XEP.


I don't really understand the point of CSI being required for Advanced Client.
Do non-mobile clients have to implement it and never send <inactive/>? Or do
servers have to disable all optimizations because enabling CSI is no longer an
implicit "I'm a mobile client with my screen off"?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20160510/36359088/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list