[Standards] RFC 6120 vs. XEP

Evgeny Khramtsov xramtsov at gmail.com
Tue Feb 7 16:29:02 UTC 2017


Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:18:39 +0300
Evgeny Khramtsov <xramtsov at gmail.com> wrote:

> Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:57:07 -0600
> Sam Whited <sam at samwhited.com> wrote:
> 
> > The rules for required stream features say that if multiple required
> > features are listed, the client picks between them. In this case,
> > clients that support it would simply pick the new bind mechanism and
> > 6120 is perfectly satisfied.  
> 
> Indeed (section 4.3.2). Then we're ok here *if* we make Bind2
> mandatory-to-negotiate.

For the record, it should be also pointed in XEP-0198 that <sm/>
feature is mandatory to negotiate.


More information about the Standards mailing list