[Summit] Agenda Items

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed May 21 16:59:27 CDT 2008


On 05/21/2008 10:45 AM, anders conbere wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Blaine Cook <romeda at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I don't know if/how agenda items are chosen for the summit in advance, or if
>> it's pretty flexible (it seemed that way last year, but there it may have
>> been the invisible hand of psa guiding discussions ;-)  ), but here are a
>> few topics that I'd love to hack on either code or spec wise:
>>
>> -- OAuth over XMPP: the use case is enabling client applications of web
>> services to authenticate in a user-friendly flow, and use that
>> authentication to allow access to certain XMPP resources. I'd love to have
>> something firm nailed down, or at least a proposal --- wether or not OAuth
>> is involved, the use case is a definite need.
> 
> And I think nailing down the language here is important. I've talked a
> lot about this in the XMPP community and I think there's a lot of
> confusion about what it means to authenticate, to authorize, how it
> would play into the web, and how the web might begin to use XMPP
> resources if this kind of workflow were nailed down.

I'll make sure to reserve a whiteboard. I think we're going to need it.

>> -- PubSub for web services: it would be really interesting for me to sit
>> down with people and figure out some best practices around implementing
>> PubSub services for web services. Basically the IRL extension of the
>> discussion on the social list.
> 
> I would love to be involved in this, right now I think there's a lot
> of people who know that their use case fits a pub sub pattern, and are
> rolling their own solutions (good), but are doing that without a body
> of literature and documentation to help them make the bests choices
> possible (bad).
> 
>> -- PubSub scalability shoot-out: I haven't found good documentation of the
>> various Jabber servers' performance characteristics, particularly as regards
>> scaling non-c2s or component usages to (i) millions of PubSub nodes, (ii)
>> tens or hundreds of thousands of subscribers per PubSub nodes, and (iii)
>> tens of billions of messages delivered per month. I'd be very interested to
>> know more about what the various servers are capable of.
>>
>> -- XMPP as an internal messaging platform: I ended up rolling my own
>> messaging server for Twitter (Starling), but I'm curious to know what level
>> of scale XMPP has seen as a messaging bus for internal systems. There are a
>> few really compelling arguments for doing so (simplicity, consistency), and
>> a few really compelling arguments against (complexity, performance), but it
>> would be fantastic to get the real goods on this.

I'm sure that various server vendors would be happy to chat about this.
Or perhaps not (secret sauce and all that...).

> I think this is huge, and could result in some very interesting XEPs.
> Right now XMPP is /nearly/ at a point where it can be used in place of
> systems like MQ or MSMQ (especially if reliability is less of an issue
> than the message passing). Getting this use case nailed down, and
> understanding what the current limitations are would be awesome.

I've seen increasing interest in this, too.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/summit/attachments/20080521/03ee4081/attachment-0001.bin 


More information about the Summit mailing list