[Summit] getting organized
stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon Jun 14 17:23:31 CDT 2010
On 6/14/10 4:20 PM, bear wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 18:04, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>> On 6/14/10 2:54 PM, bear wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 16:51, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>>>> On 6/14/10 2:49 PM, bear wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 16:26, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>>>>>> 3. What pressing issues do people want to solve? Do we need a Summit to
>>>>>> make progress on those issues, or can we do so by other means?
>>>>> Interop and testing - that's my major focus to be honest.
>>>> Yes, I think that makes a lot of sense. So the next question is: where
>>>> do we have interop issues? What do we need to test? One persistent issue
>>>> I hear about is secure s2s, whether TLS+dialback (whatever that means!)
>>>> or TLS+SASL-EXTERNAL.
>>> I do think we need to focus on that and I would like to see something
>>> in Jingle area - because iPhone4 gives us a nice point to raise the
>>> interop banner.
>>> Personally I would also like to see some PubSub or MUC - but I think
>>> the above will be more than enough
>> - servers test secure s2s
>> - clients test Jingle
>> - both clients and servers test MUC (maybe I can have the XEP-0045
>> revisions done by then and we can do final fixes based on interop testing)
>> We could also do some testing of XEP-0198 and roster versioning (for
>> both clients and servers).
> *stamp* +1
> (including the addendum "below")
> plus, it will take us all of the rest of the time just simply
> discussing *how* to do the above ;)
No no no. This time we need to get organized ahead of time. :P
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Summit